Long live caesar latin3/11/2023 ![]() ![]() In those times there was almost no way to have money without having land.Īround the year 100 BC, two political parties began to emerge: the Optimates and the Populares. The patricii controlled most of the land in Italy, and the plebs had almost none. Although there was voting, and elections were open to all citizens, the votes were weighted-you could even say ‘rigged’-so that only the votes of the upper class actually counted.Īlthough the plebs fought for, and eventually achieved, political equality with the patricii, they were still much poorer. However, the republic wasn’t a democracy in the sense we know today. As a republic, Rome was ruled by Senatus Populusque Romanus, ‘The Senate and the People of Rome,’ rather than by a single king. ![]() There were two ordines, or social classes, in ancient Rome: the plebs, the lower class and the patricii, the upper class, which dominated the Senate and the political offices of the Roman Republic.Īccording to legend, the Roman Republic was founded in 509 BC, after the last King of Rome was driven out of the city. Image by Jbribeiro1 on Wikimedia Commons, licensed under CC-PD-Mark Ordines ![]() Perhaps it’s time for me to revisit some Caesar this summer (Gardini, an unabashed enthusiast for this writer, would doubtless approve).Caesar is shown the head of Pompey. So thank you, classical Twitter, for the stimulus to reflection. (Quite a threatening posture to adopt in relation to these readers, in other words, and one that fits with the image of a Caesar who was interested in stirring things up in Rome itself).Ĭertainly I’m more interested now in a range of questions about the relationship between political and military authority and literate communication that I hadn’t considered all that clearly before. A character, that is, who might come across as the very opposite of an effete aristocrat, and instead as a down to earth man of the rank and file military. My starting (and strong) assumption here is that the Gallic Wars was not a text intended for a readership of ordinary soldiers: why, in that case, write like one? Well, perhaps to identify oneself as a particular sort of character to one’s actual (well-heeled urban?) readers. The notion (suggested by Llewelyn Morgan) that Caesar’s ‘pragmatic’ style in his writing reflects an attempt to ‘keep it that of a plain soldier’ struck me as a particularly interesting possibility. Reception in France, Nap III, Jullian, Goudineau Gaulish history (epigr, ling, numismatics, La Tene archaeology.Ĥ. Political-cultural history of empire (rhetoric, othering theory slavery)ģ. The thread, started by John Ma (link below), is worth viewing in full:Ģ. A number of classicists aired views on themes and stylistic elements in the Gallic Wars which confirmed (and indeed challenged) my own thinking. That this is indeed the case was nicely brought to light on (of all places) a Twitter thread recently. But what about the chilling nature of some of Caesar’s descriptions (chilling, that is, precisely because of their lack of graphic description or celebration where some such might have been expected)? There is a good deal more to say about his prose style, I felt, than Gardini does say. This is a text I haven’t read much myself since sixth form days, but my memory of its style is good enough: Caesar displays a special knack throughout the text for conveying the brutal suppression of his enemies and the trials faced by his armies with unnerving understatement and precision.įor Gardini, Caesar is, straightforwardly, the ‘matter of fact’ prose stylist par excellence: he is a rationalist, a pragmatist, someone who wants to ‘recreate the world mathematically and geometrically, as if the obscurity and vagueness of our deeper motives had no place here’ (p72-3). ![]() One part of the book I didn’t much warm to was Gardini’s discussion of the prose of Julius Caesar in his Gallic Wars (Caesar’s account of a major stage in the Roman conquest of Gaul). The book has by turns intrigued and frustrated me. Gardini focuses on a range of Latin texts he has encountered and on the nature of his personal responses to them over the course of his education and career. The book is a nice combination of personal reflection and linguistic and literary discussion. My recent bedtime reading has been Nicola Gardini’s fun little book ‘ Long live Latin: the Pleasures of a Useless Language‘. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |